“But how could you have expected to travel that path in thought alone; how to expect to measure the moon by the fish? No, my neighbors, never think that path is a short one; you must have lions’ hearts to go by that way; it is not short and its seas are deep; you will walk it long in wonder, sometimes smiling, sometimes weeping.” --Attar, Parliament of the Birds (from Little, BIG)
Living is such a complicated business. And when you speculate on the nature of society, suddenly things are a lot more complicated. I’ve been taking a class called “History of Literary Criticism” this semester. Bluntly, it's philosophy thinly disguised as an English course. But it is interesting, (most of the time).
Lately we’ve been working on Marxist and Post-Marxist criticism. It’s VERY depressing stuff. In the realm of Post-Marxism we had to read a fellow named Baudrillard. I was so discouraged by the discussion of his writing that I started to take ‘train of thought’ notes. Basically I wrote down phrases the professor said that reflected what Baudrillard seemed to be talking about (and a few of my own thoughts).
Here’s a taste of it: “post-modern paralysis filled with speculations, collective desire, collective suicide, rather dark reading, confronted with the other, alienation, (alien nation), we’re all aliens now, everyone is a statistic, just a statistic, devolution, widespread apathy, 'opinions' of the polled, manipulating public opinion, squashing and denying our individuality, numbers and the contemporary reality, anti-human....”
Depressing stuff, huh? Baudrillard is telling us that we are being manipulated by polls and the media into a world that doesn’t reflect human opinion. Of course, it’s pretty much impossible to reflect human opinion because we hardly even know what our own opinions are half the time! The sad thing is that he doesn’t offer any solution. He just thinks we’re going to destroy ourselves. Someone needs to take his Prozac. ;p
After finishing Baudrillard, we moved on to a new and very different concept. Ferdiand de Saussure, the father of modern linguistics, brought up the idea that our reality is determined by our language. I rather like this. It’s called Structuralism. The limits of our reality are the limits of our language. There are things out there we don’t have words for. Also, speakers of other languages live in a different realities from English. Chinese speakers don’t see the same world as Spanish speakers – because they have different words for different things. For example, Eskimos have 40+ words for snow. English speakers have 4 or so. If we were to travel to the north pole we would just see... snow. But an Eskimo would see much, much more. Wild!
“The limits of our language are the limits of our world.” – Wittgeustein
So go out and learn some new words. Expand your reality. Take the path from where you are and see what you can find out. It won’t always be easy. But it’s probably worth it...
Happy travels.